Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Ingram v. Case-Mate, Inc.
as 5:2023cv02813
Plaintiff:
Warren Ingram
Defendant:
Case-Mate, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
United States of America v. Vasquez (Wilkin De Los Santos)
as 22-3164
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gerald Vasquez, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Gary Bierd, AKA Gary Bird, AKA V.O., Irvin Castillo, AKA Mune and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Wilkin De Los Santos
Clement v. Case-Mate, Inc.
as 6:2022cv01052
Plaintiff:
Olivier Clement
Defendant:
Case-Mate, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pil v. NLRB
as 21-1249
Petitioner:
International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots, ILA, AFL-CIO
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Mate Valoaga v. Earl Houser
as 20-35995
Respondent / Appellee:
EARL HOUSER, Superintendent III, State of Alaska Dept of Correction
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATE VALOAGA
Wilson Electronics v. CellPhone-Mate et al
as 4:2018cv00078
Defendant:
CellPhone-Mate and Jonathan Bacon
Plaintiff:
Wilson Electronics
Nicoline Ambe v. Trip Mate Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00115
Plaintiff:
Nicoline Ambe and The Estate of Ndiforchu Alfred Tamunang
Defendant:
Does, Trip Mate Inc and United States Fire Insurance Company
Pakdeljam v. Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03197
Defendant:
Lawrence J. Hineline, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc., Sharon Mates and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Pakdeljam
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Yoo v. Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02928
Defendant:
Lawrence J. Hineline, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc., Sharon Mates and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Yoo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
GREENE v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 1:2016cv02115
Plaintiff:
LAUREN GREENE
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, AMY DOSIK, PETER DOSIK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1738
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
