Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Champion v. Mathy Construction Company et al
as 0:2023cv03415
Plaintiff:
Ronice Champion
Defendant:
Mathy Construction Company, Ryan J Leisgang and Ryan J. Leisgang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Mathis v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
Kennita Mathis
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Christenson v. A.L.M. Holding Company
as 0:2021cv01701
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Johan Christenson
Defendant:
A.L.M. Holding Company doing business as Mathy Construction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morgan et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02259
Plaintiff:
Sean Allen, Trent Janosa, Shawn Roe and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Mcdermott et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02251
Plaintiff:
Jory Mathis, Leland Marshall, Chris Kelley and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Strosnider et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02139
Plaintiff:
Robert Mauer, Paul Perdue, Hugh Powell and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Mathies v. Schmadeke
as 0:2018cv01532
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mathies
Defendant:
Rita Kay Schmadeke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mathis v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv04570
Plaintiff:
Patricia Mathis
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hopkins et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2015cv02773
Plaintiff:
Samuel R. Hopkins, Jr. and Doreen E. Mathis-Hopkins
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mathis v. Davol, Inc. et alDO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT..
as 0:2009cv01132
Plaintiff:
William Mathis
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Type:
Torts - Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
