Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Mathis v. Warden HDSP et al
as 2:2023cv00980
Petitioner:
Dontae Mathis
Respondent:
Warden HDSP and State of Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mathis v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv00936
Plaintiff:
Dontae Mathis
Defendant:
Julie Williams and Grievance Coordinator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv00935
Plaintiff:
Dontae Mathis
Defendant:
Julie Williams, Thurson Moore and Jonathan Binder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Director of Accounting NDOC
as 2:2023cv00874
Plaintiff:
Dontae Mathis
Defendant:
Director of Accounting NDOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Warden N.N.C.C.
as 3:2022cv00091
Petitioner:
Jason Mathis
Respondent:
Warden N.N.C.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mathis v. Quinn et al
as 2:2020cv02171
Defendant:
Phong Q. Ho and Kelly B. Quinn
Plaintiff:
Jason Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trujillo v. Landsman et al
as 2:2020cv01643
Defendant:
Dr Mathis, H Landsman, Ben Gutierrez and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Trujillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2015cv00300
Plaintiff:
David Abbatt, Jonathan Albay, Taiwan Allen and others
Defendant:
James G. Cox, Nevada Attorney General and Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. San Francisco Child Support Services et al
as 3:2010cv00390
Defendant:
Child Protective Services, Department of Health, San Francisco Child Support Services and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Mathis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mathis v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 3:2009cv00261
Plaintiff:
Jason Mathis
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center, Todd Hendrix, Madrid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
