Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Tipping v. MATRIXX Initiatives, Inc., et al
as 4:2011cv00361
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Tipping
Defendant:
Matrixx Initiatives Inc, Zicam, LLC and Botanical Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffin v. MATRIXX Initiatives, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Gumtech International, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00267
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Griffin
Defendant:
MATRIXX Initiatives, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Gumtech International, Inc. and ZICAM LLC, f/k/a Gel Tech, LLC an Arizona Limited Liability Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Head v. Matrixx Initiatives Inc et al
as 2:2009cv00234
Defendant:
Matrixx Initiatives Inc and Zicam LLC
Plaintiff:
Maria E Head
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
King v. MATRIXX Initiatives, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Gumtech International, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00232
Plaintiff:
Sherrin Dawn King
Defendant:
MATRIXX Initiatives, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Gumtech International, Inc. and ZICAM LLC, f/k/a Gel Tech, LLC an Arizona Limited Liability Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ECHOLS v. MATRIXX Initiatives, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Gumtech International, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00213
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ECHOLS
Defendant:
MATRIXX Initiatives, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Gumtech International, Inc. and ZICAM LLC, f/k/a Gel Tech, LLC an Arizona Limited Liability Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRANDON v. MATRIXX Initiatives, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Gumtech International, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00008
Plaintiff:
MARY ANN BRANDON
Defendant:
MATRIXX Initiatives, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Gumtech International, Inc. and ZICAM LLC, f/k/a Gel Tech, LLC an Arizona Limited Liability Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
