Cases 1 - 10 of 38
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv09926
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW J SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv03324
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JOHN SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16161
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW RAY SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11923
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JOHN SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 2:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
Matthew Gunnar Smith
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Sean Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109 - Federal Railroad Safety Act
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20512
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW RYAN SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11117
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DADSON SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv50657
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JOSEPH SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv19097
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JAMES SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv05872
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW D SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
