Cases 41 - 50 of 79
Jiang v. Barr
as 19-134
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jingliang Jiang
Liu v. Barr
as 19-117
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Xue Yong Liu
Chen v. Barr
as 19-107
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Qi Xuan Chen
Fishman v. Barr
as 19-75
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Vadim Semenovich Fishman, AKA Kevin Sosa, AKA Michael Shapiro
Garcia v. Barr
as 19-153
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, Acting United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Eduardo Garcia
Pastor v. Barr
as 19-77
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Natalio C. Pastor
Liu v. Barr
as 19-105
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, Acting United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jibin Liu
Lin v. Barr
as 19-85
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Tingyi Lin, AKA Ting Jiang Lin, AKA Cady Jiang
Carrera v. Barr
as 19-74
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Mauricio Carrera
Hall v. Barr
as 19-44
Petitioner:
Romeo Valentino Hall, AKA Romeo Hall, AKA Romeo V. Hall
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
