Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 127
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by filed date
Lulea v. Barr
as 19-2
Respondent: Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner: Puiu Vali Lulea
Lin v. Barr
as 19-85
Respondent: Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner: Tingyi Lin, AKA Ting Jiang Lin, AKA Cady Jiang
Ahmed v. Barr
as 19-3
Respondent: Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner: Farid Ahmed
Carrera v. Barr
as 19-74
Respondent: Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner: Mauricio Carrera
Chery v. Barr
as 19-297
Respondent: Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner: Lyxon Chery
Diallo v. Barr
as 19-7
Respondent: Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner: Mariama Dioulde Diallo
Liu v. Barr
as 19-117
Respondent: Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner: Xue Yong Liu
Zhao v. Barr
as 19-398
Respondent: Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, Acting United States Attorney General
Petitioner: Shoulong Zhao
Zammett v. Barr
as 19-209
Respondent: Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner: Winston Zammett
Jiang v. Barr
as 19-134
Respondent: Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner: Jingliang Jiang

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?