Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 90 of 127
Chen v. Barr
as 19-10
Respondent: Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner: Xiaocui Chen
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00066
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00086
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Montoya-Cruz v. Feeley et al
as 6:2019cv06008
Respondent: Kirstjen M Nielsen, Matthew G Whitaker, Thomas Feeley and others
Petitioner: Elmis Adalid Montoya-Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tavarez v. Whitaker
as 19-21
Respondent: Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General
Petitioner: Hilda De Los Angel Tavarez, AKA Chloe Tavarez, AKA Cloe Lnu
Kartiukov v. Barr
as 19-8
Respondent: Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, Acting United States Attorney General
Petitioner: Yevhenii Kartiukov
Xu v. Barr
as 19-11
Respondent: Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner: Hongfang Xu
Toe v. Whitaker, Attorney General of the United States et al
as 6:2019cv06007
Respondent: Matthew G Whitaker, Attorney General of the United States, Kristjen Nielsen and Thomas E. Feeley
Petitioner: David Toe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bagale v. Barr
as 19-5
Petitioner: Dilli Ram Bagale
Respondent: Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Gonzalez-Polanco v. Barr
as 19-30
Respondent: Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner: Maria Fernanda Gonzalez-Polanco and Christopher Mauricio Orellana-Gonzalez

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?