Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01922
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Nana Yaw Amo v. William P. Barr
as 19-1637
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States and MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
NANA YAW AMO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv08309
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Gerson Naun Ramos Benegas v. William P. Barr
as 19-1275
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States and MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
GERSON NAUN RAMOS BENEGAS
Jose Cartajena Galindo v. William P. Barr
as 19-1276
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States and MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
JOSE DE LA CRUZ CARTAJENA GALINDO
Cesar Vallejo-Ramirez v. William P. Barr
as 19-1281
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States and MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
CESAR VALLEJO-RAMIREZ
Pride Holdings, LLC v. Nielson et al
as 1:2019cv00659
Defendant:
Director L. Francis Cissna, Matthew G Whitaker, Secretary Kirstjen Nielson and others
Plaintiff:
Pride Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00774
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Muhammad Butt v. William P. Barr
as 19-1165
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States and MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
MUHAMMAD T. BUTT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01658
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
