Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Proman v. Gatsby Yacht Group, LLC
as 2:2022cv02088
Petitioner:
Matthew Proman
Respondent:
Gatsby Yacht Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Gatsby Yacht Group, LLC v. M/Y "East Bound & Down
as 21-1704
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gatsby Yacht Group, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, AKA Gatsby Enterprises, LLC, a Rhode Island Limited Libaility Company
Defendant / Appellee:
M/Y "East Bound & Down", A 2006 Azimut Benetti manufactured motorized 69.5 yacht, her boats, engines, tackle, equipment, apparel, furnishings, freights, appurtenances, and all fixtures and other necessaries there unto appertaining and belonging to th and Matthew Proman
Intervenor:
SK Marine Electronics, Inc., Maritime Diesel Electric, Inc., A 2006 Azimut Benetti manufactured motorized 69.5 yacht, her boats, engines, tackle, equipment, apparel, furnishings, freights, appurtenances, and all fixtures and other necessaries there unto appertaining and belongin and Lenmarine, Inc., DBA Bristol Marine, AKA Bristol Marine Somerset
The Standard Fire Insurance Company v. Proman
as 2:2019cv05036
Plaintiff:
The Standard Fire Insurance Company
Defendant:
Matthew Proman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04242
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 741 Shipping
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00568
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
