Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Brauer v. McMenamins, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01078
Plaintiff:
Matthew Scott Brauer
Defendant:
McMenamins, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Darex, LLC v. Simba Pte Ltd
as 1:2021cv00622
Plaintiff:
Matthew A Darex, LLC and Darex, LLC
Defendant:
Simba Pte Ltd, dba 1Outlets and Simba Pte Ltd a company existing under the laws of Singapore doing business as 1Outlets
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
McDermott v. United News International Inc.
as 3:2018cv02108
Plaintiff:
Matthew McDermott
Defendant:
United News International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
MetaMetrics, Inc. v. NWEA et al
as 3:2017cv01059
Defendant:
Matthew Chapman, NWEA and Jeffrey Strickler
Plaintiff:
MetaMetrics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Universal Tea Company, Inc. v. Stash Cannabis Company, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00685
Defendant:
Chris Matthews and Stash Cannabis Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Universal Tea Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Zing Toys, Inc. v. Zuru, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv00863
Defendant:
Anna Jane Mowbray, Matthew Peter Mowbray, Nicholas James Mowbray and others
Plaintiff:
Zing Toys, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. M.R.H. , Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv01037
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Broadcast Music, Inc., MJ Publishing Trust and others
Defendant:
M.R.H. , Inc. and Robert E. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
TM Computer Consulting, Inc. v. Apothacare, LLC et al
as 6:2008cv06267
Plaintiff:
TM Computer Consulting, Inc.
Defendant:
Apothacare, LLC and Matthew Reed
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Keen Mobility Company v. Intensive Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00733
Plaintiff:
Keen Mobility Company
Defendant:
Intensive Therapeutics, Inc. and Matthew Dudonis
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 102 Invalidity and Nonenforceability of U.S. Patent
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
