Cases 1 - 7 of 7
USA v. Approx. $163,051.00 in U.S. Currency
as 2:2021mc00228
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $163,051.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Matthew Thornton
USA v. Approximately $6,420.00 in U.S. Currency
as 2:2019mc00110
Defendant:
Approximately $6,420.00 in U.S. Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Daniel Estes and Matthew Tobiasz
United States Of America v. Approximately $150,000
as 3:2015cv05651
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Approximately $150,000
Claimant:
Matthew Torres
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Approximately $200,979.15 seized from Tradehill, Inc., held in the name of Megan Thompson et al
as 2:2014at01604
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $200,979.15 seized from Tradehill, Inc., held in the name of Megan Thompson, Approximately $53,302.06 seized from Tradehill, Inc., held in the name of Matthew Gillum, 1,238.6004395 Bitcoins valued at approximately $464,772.43 seized from Tradehill, Inc., held in the name of Megan Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 2003 Mercedes Benz E55 AMG, VIN: WDBUF76J73A280733
as 2:2013cv01274
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2003 Mercedes Benz E55 AMG, VIN: WDBUF76J73A280733, License Number 5EQB640
Claimant:
Matthew Sean Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. $83,010.00 in U.S. Currency et al
as 3:2013cv01096
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$83,010.00 in U.S. Currency and $300.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Matthew Palmer
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $15,609.00 in U.S. Currency
as 3:2011cv02593
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$15,609.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Matthew Donald Earnhart
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
