Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Rogan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rogan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ptak v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Paul Matthew Ptak
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Davide v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02117
Plaintiff:
Matthew Davide
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mallett v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Matthew R Mallett
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lucas v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lucas
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Reasin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv06723
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kevin Reasin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Evans v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv01590
Plaintiff:
Matthew S. Evans
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Paynes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv08007
Plaintiff:
Matthew Paynes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Zerafa v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv06607
Plaintiff:
Matthew R. Zerafa
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dixon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv06422
Plaintiff:
Matthew T. Dixon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
