Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Maxfield v. USA
as 3:2023cv02372
Petitioner:
Travis Cole Maxfield
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams et al
as 1:2019cv00144
Defendant:
Brookstone Company Inc, Brookstone, Inc., Brookstone Stores, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams and Ashley Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Calvin Klein Trademark Trust et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv06093
Plaintiff:
Calvin Klein Trademark Trust and Calvin Klein, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Laura Hooper, Rose Moorman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Maxfield-Kraft v. Abbott Laboratories Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00771
Plaintiff:
Amber Maxfield-Kraft
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories Inc. and AbbVie Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. Brookstone Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00044
Plaintiff:
Ashley C. Williams , Michael S. Williams and Garth Williams
Defendant:
Brookstone Stores, Inc., Brookstone, Inc., Brookstone Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v Melvin et al
as 1:2017cv01522
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lee
Defendant:
Michael P Melvin, . Maxfield, . Dillon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxfield v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2017cv50192
Plaintiff:
Kory Maxfield
Defendant:
I.D.O.C., Donald Enloe and Roger Dewey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Shick et al
as 1:2017cv01246
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee
Defendant:
Mitchell Shick, Michael Melvin, DeLong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Travis Maxfield
as 15-2339
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TRAVIS C. MAXFIELD
Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Maxfield et al
as 1:2014cv05377
Plaintiff:
Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Defendant:
Clark Maxfield and James Maloney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
