Cases 51 - 60 of 72
Wilbon et al v. Plovanich et al
as 1:2012cv01132
Plaintiff:
David D. Wilbon , Rico M. Wilbon and George J. Smith
Defendant:
Joseph M. Plovanich, Officer Millan, Kevin A. Graney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv07492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holliman v. McDermott et al
as 3:2011cv50222
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Holliman
Defendant:
Joseph McDermott and The County of Winnebago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv04629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv07276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Badakshanian v. McDermott Will & Emery LLP
as 1:2010cv03025
Plaintiff:
Barbara Badakshanian
Defendant:
McDermott Will & Emery LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Law Firm of McDermott & Krupa, P.C. v. Apps Communication, Inc.
as 1:2009cv06326
Defendant:
Apps Communication, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Law Firm of McDermott & Krupa, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Injunctive/Declaratory Relief
Salcedo et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2009cv05354
Plaintiff:
Gloria Salcedo, Claudia Salcedo and Teresa Salcedo
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Jerome Finnigan, John Burzinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDermott et al v. O'Brien et al
as 1:2008cv05384
Plaintiff:
Mark McDermott and Cailin McDermott
Defendant:
Peter O'Brien and Chicago Board of Education
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Suggs v. Carrol et al
as 1:2008cv02635
Plaintiff:
Lenneth Suggs, Lenneth Suggs, Lenneth Suggs and others
Defendant:
Officer Carrol, Officer McDermott, Unknown Officers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
