Cases 41 - 50 of 57
BAILEY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2012cv00104
Plaintiff:
CHELSIE BAILEY , JEREMIAH BALDWIN , BLAINE B BALLARD and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cordova v. City of Albuqeruque et al
as 1:2011cv00806
Plaintiff:
Stephan Cordova
Defendant:
City of Albuquerque , Ray Schultz , Carlos Argueta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McKay v. Macy's West Stores, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00334
Plaintiff:
Cynthia L. McKay
Defendant:
Macy's West Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Richards-McKay v. National Amusements, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00487
Defendant:
National Amusements, Inc. and Sunrise Multiplex Cinemas
Plaintiff:
Ayisha Richards-McKay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McKay et al v. The City of New York
as 1:2010cv07187
Plaintiff:
Mark McKay and Belinda McKay
Defendant:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101
STANLEY v. EATON PEABODY et al
as 2:2010cv00345
Plaintiff:
PATTY RAE STANLEY
Defendant:
EATON PEABODY, DAN MCKAY and SARAH ZMISTOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STANLEY v. EATON PEABODY et al
as 1:2010cv00345
Plaintiff:
PATTY RAE STANLEY
Defendant:
EATON PEABODY , DAN MCKAY and SARAH ZMISTOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McKay et al v. The City of New York
as 1:2010cv01220
Plaintiff:
Daniel McKay and Toniann McKay
Defendant:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101
McKay et al v. The City of New York
as 1:2010cv00863
Plaintiff:
Joseph McKay and Lisa McKay
Defendant:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101
Brown et al v. Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00570
Plaintiff:
Willie Brown, All Plaintiffs, Stacey Swanier and others
Defendant:
Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
