Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Roy v. Secretary of The United States Department of Agriculture
as 1:2023cv02577
Plaintiff:
Debabrata Roy doing business as Quality Meat Market
Defendant:
Secretary of The United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2023 Denial application to participate; food stamp prog.
Montes et al v. Cardenas et al
as 1:2022cv04208
Plaintiff:
Hilario Montes, Jr., Nicolas Delgado, Uriel Delgado and others
Defendant:
Louis Gerardo Cardenas, Eder Cifuentes, David Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Owners Insurance Company v. Wine et al
as 1:2022cv04041
Plaintiff:
Owners Insurance Company
Defendant:
Shawn Wine, Dolgencorp, LLC, KOB Investments, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Delgado v. Georgia Halal Meat & Catering Inc.
as 1:2021cv00430
Defendant:
Georgia Halal Meat & Catering Inc.
Plaintiff:
Arturo Delgado
Kamara v. Prime Meats Online, Inc.
as 1:2020cv05009
Plaintiff:
Jatou Kamara
Defendant:
Prime Meats Online, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00213
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
White v. Maddigan et al
as 1:2020cv03772
Plaintiff:
Karla White
Defendant:
Trevor Maddigan, Old Republic Insurance Company and Cargill Meat Logistics Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STRIPLING'S GENERAL STORE INC v. CARROLL'S SAUSAGE AND MEATS INC
as 1:2018cv00119
Plaintiff:
STRIPLING'S GENERAL STORE INC
Defendant:
CARROLL'S SAUSAGE AND MEATS INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
