Cases 31 - 40 of 93
Anant Tripati v. Corizon Incorporated, et al
as 20-16816
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, CORIZON INCORPORATED, DANIEL MORENO, Mailroom Officer Florence and others
Appellee:
ARIZONA BOARD OF NURSING and ARIZONA MEDICAL BOARD
Michael Peters v. State of Texas, et al
as 20-40547
Defendant / Appellee:
Shelly Baldwin, Texas Medical Board, King and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Anant Tripati v. Corizon Incorporated, et al
as 20-16306
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, CORIZON INCORPORATED, DANIEL MORENO, Mailroom Officer Florence and others
Appellee:
ARIZONA BOARD OF NURSING and ARIZONA MEDICAL BOARD
Robert Gamez, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 20-16180
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, named as: United States, MARQUIS SOFTWARE, formerly referred to as Doe 11, GARCIA, First Name Unknown; CO III and others
Defendant / Appellee:
STACY CRABTREE, central office classification ofc, WILLETT, First Name Unknown; Correctional Officer, Arizona Department of Corrections, RASTOGI, First Name Unknown; psychiatrist at Ariz. Dept. of Corr. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT CARRASCO GAMEZ, Jr.
Planned Parenthood Center, et al v. Greg Abbott, Governor of TX, et al
as 20-50314
Defendant / Appellant:
PHIL WILSON, in his official capacity as Acting Executive Commissioner of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, KEN PAXTON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Texas, KATHERINE A. THOMAS, in her official capacity as the Executive Director of the Texas Board of Nursing and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BROOKSIDE WOMEN'S MEDICAL CENTER, P.A., doing business as Brookside Women's Health Center and Austin Women's Health Center, PLANNED PARENTHOOD CENTER FOR CHOICE, ROBIN WALLACE, M.D., M.A.S. and others
In Re: Leslie Rutledge, et al
as 20-1791
Petitioner:
State of Tennessee, State of Kentucky, Marie Holder, in her official capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
Preterm-Cleveland, et al v. Attorney General of Ohio, et al
as 20-3365
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY PROSECUTOR, MAHONING COUNTY PROSECUTOR, FRANKLIN COUNTY PROSECUTOR and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OHIO, SECRETARY STATE MEDICAL BOARD OF OHIO and DIRECTOR OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO, CAPITAL CARE NETWORK OF TOLEDO, DOCTOR SHARON LINER and others
Amicus Curiae:
CITIZENS FOR COMMUNITY VALUES, on behalf of 125 Individual Doctors, Nurses and Health Professionals to be named; Professional Medical Associations to be named., COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, and States Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia and AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE
In re: Gregg Abbott, et al
as 20-50264
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Respondent:
SOUTHWESTERN WOMEN'S SURGERY CENTER, WHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH ALLIANCE, ROBIN WALLACE, M.D., M.A.S. and others
Petitioner:
KATHERINE A. THOMAS, in her official capacity as the Executive Director of the Texas Board of Nursing, PHIL WILSON, in his official capacity as Acting Executive Commissioner of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, In re: GREGG ABBOTT, in his official capacity as Governor of Texas and others
Anant Tripati v. Corizon Incorporated, et al
as 20-15380
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, CORIZON INCORPORATED, DANIEL MORENO, Mailroom Officer Florence and others
Appellee:
ARIZONA BOARD OF NURSING and ARIZONA MEDICAL BOARD
Anthony Patel v. Charles Robinson, et al
as 20-55241
Defendant / Appellee:
MARANGA MORGENSTERN, REED SMITH LLP, MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON, PLC and others
Defendant:
LEAH WILSON and THE MALONEY FIRM APC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY A. PATEL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
