Cases 1 - 9 of 9
NOT USED
as 2:2020cv01421
Plaintiff:
Cheryl C. Brandon
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Brandon v. Wright Medical Technologies, Inc.
as 2:2020cv01422
Plaintiff:
Cheryl C. Brandon
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Laron v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01161
Defendant:
Wright Medical Group, Inc. and Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anthony Laron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quest Capital Partners, LC v. Noninvasive Medical Technologies, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00379
Defendant:
Noninvasive Medical Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Quest Capital Partners, LC
Unknown:
Fred K. Herrmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Inomedic/Innovative Health v. Noninvasive Medical Technologies, Inc.
as 2:2014ms00044
Petitioner:
Inomedic/Innovative Health
Respondent:
Noninvasive Medical Technologies, Inc.
Inomedic/Innovative Health v. Noninvasive Medical Technologies, Inc.
as 2:2014cv01035
Petitioner:
Inomedic/Innovative Health
Respondent:
Noninvasive Medical Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith et al v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00704
Plaintiff:
Dorothy R Smith and Thomas Smith
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
de Martinez v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00694
Defendant:
Wright Medical Europe, S.A., Wright Medical Group, Inc. and Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Suzanne de Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Johnney Melancon vs. Harrah's Entertainment, Inc., et al.,
as 2:2008cv00212
Plaintiff:
Morteza Shamsnia, Morteza Shamsnia and Morteza Shamsnia
Defendant:
ICS Imaging Systems, Inc., ICS Imaging Systems, Inc., Sunrise Medical Technology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
