Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
ABERNATHY et al v. CARLYLE GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv03603
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ABERNATHY, CEDRICK ARTHUR, LARRY BESS and others
Defendant:
The Carlyle Group, Inc., MANTECH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, MANTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ALEJANDRO v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2022cv01374
Plaintiff:
OMAR MEDINA ALEJANDRO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALEJANDRO v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2022cv01301
Plaintiff:
OMAR MEDINA ALEJANDRO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALEJANDRO v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2022cv01300
Plaintiff:
OMAR MEDINA ALEJANDRO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALEJANDRO v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
as 1:2022cv01161
Plaintiff:
OMAR MEDINA ALEJANDRO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALEJANDRO v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
as 1:2022cv01020
Plaintiff:
OMAR MEDINA ALEJANDRO
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALEJANDRO v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
as 1:2022cv01040
Plaintiff:
OMAR MEDINA ALEJANDRO
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALEJANDRO v. FBI
as 1:2022cv01002
Plaintiff:
OMAR MEDINA ALEJANDRO
Defendant:
FBI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALEJANDRO v. BIDEN
as 1:2022cv01003
Plaintiff:
OMAR MEDINA ALEJANDRO
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
