Cases 41 - 50 of 115
Smith v. Medtronic Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00512
Plaintiff:
Roy L. Smith and Pamela C. Smith
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc and Medtronic Sofamore Danek USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Medtronic Inc
as 5:2013cv00451
Plaintiff:
Peggy Jo Smith
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McBride et al v. Medtronic Inc
as 1:2013cv00377
Plaintiff:
Andrew McBride and Nancy McBride
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lassalle et al v. Pappas et al
as 2:2012cv02649
Plaintiff:
Belinda T. Lassalle and Anthony J. Timphony
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sons v. Medtronic Inc
as 6:2012cv02579
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Sons
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Goings v. Medtronic Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00540
Plaintiff:
Thomas Goings
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv01826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Gavin v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00851
Plaintiff:
Martin Z Gavin
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. and Medtronic USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kaigler v. Medtronic Inc et al
as 2:2011cv01595
Plaintiff:
James Kaigler
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc, Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Ramos et al
as 3:2011cv00511
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Smith and Karen Mechelle Smith
Defendant:
Marco A Ramos , Marco A Ramos M D Professional Corp , Medtronic Sofamor Danek U S A Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
