Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Valdez v. Medtronic USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00602
Defendant:
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., Medtronic USA, Inc. and Medtronic, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose Norbeto Valdez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Muniz v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00451
Defendant:
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. and Medtronic, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Muniz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Selke v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00002
Plaintiff:
Mary Susan Selke
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Johnson v. Regeneration Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00086
Plaintiff:
Howard Gilford Johnson, III
Defendant:
Regeneration Technologies, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nelson v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, USA, Inc., et al
as 2:2007cv00069
Plaintiff:
Cora Nelson and Cora Nelson
Defendant:
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, USA, Inc.,, SpinalGraft Technologies, LLC., Regeneration Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cooper v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, USA, Inc., et al
as 2:2007cv00068
Plaintiff:
Randy Cooper and Randy Cooper
Defendant:
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, USA, Inc.,, SpinalGraft Technologies, LLC., Regeneration Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Klinefelter v. Regeneration Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00043
Plaintiff:
Irene Klinefelter
Defendant:
Regeneration Technologies, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lozano et al v. Regeneration Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00044
Plaintiff:
Kim Lozano and Edward Lozano
Defendant:
Regeneration Technologies, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
