Cases filed in Massachusetts
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
FWK Holdings LLC et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv11056
Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd., Endo International PLC, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Meijer Distribution, Inc., Meijer, Inc. and FWK Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
FWK Holdings LLC et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv11057
Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd., Endo International PLC, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Meijer Distribution, Inc., Meijer, Inc. and FWK Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re: Ranbaxy Generic Drug Application Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2019md02878
In Re: Ranbaxy Generic Drug Application Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: Meijer, Inc., Meijer Distribution, Inc., Cesar Castillo, Inc. and others
Defendant: Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, Ranbaxy, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: United Food and Commercial Workers Health and Welfare Fund of Northern Pennsylvania and Louisiana Health Services and Indemnity Company d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana
Respondent: Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc.
Interested Party: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals L.P.
Not Classified By Court: Winifred Weitsen
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Meijer, Inc. et al v. Ranbaxy Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv12129
Plaintiff: Meijer Distribution, Inc. and Meijer, Inc.
Defendant: Ranbaxy U.S.A. Inc., Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Limited, Ranbaxy Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
MEIJER INC. et al v. RANBAXY, INC. et al
as 1:2017mc91266
Plaintiff: MEIJER INC. and Meijer Distribution, Inc.
Defendant: Ranbaxy Inc., RANBAXY LABORATORIES, LTD., Ranbaxy U.S.A. Inc. and others
Respondent: Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Endo Health Solutions Inc.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
MEIJER, INC. et al v. RANBAXY, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv11066
Petitioner: Meijer, Inc. and Meijer Distribution, Inc.
Respondent: Ranbaxy Inc., RANBAXY LABORATORIES, LTD., Ranbaxy U.S.A. Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Prinston Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
FWK Holdings LLC v. Shire PLC et al (Direct Purchaser Antitrust Class Action Complaint) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv12653
Defendant: Shire PLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Actavis Elizabeth LLC and others
Plaintiff: FWK Holdings LLC
Consolidated Plaintiff: Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc.
Intervenor Plaintiff: Meijer Distribution, Inc., Meijer, Inc. and BI-LO, LLC
Intervenor Defendant: Shire LLC and Shire US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re Lantus Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv12652
Defendant: Sanofi GmbH, Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC and Sanofi-Aventis Puerto Rico, Inc.
Plaintiff: FWK Holdings LLC, Meijer, Inc. and Meijer Distribution, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff: Cesar Castillo, LLC and Cesar Castillo, Inc
Intervenor Plaintiff: RDC Liquidating Trust, by and through its trustee, Advisory Trust Group LLC, MLI Rx LLC, Burlington Drug Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Meijer Distribution, Inc. et al v. Allergan, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv11740
Plaintiff: Meijer Distribution, Inc. and Meijer, Inc.
Defendant: Allergan Inc. , Allergan USA Inc., Allergan Sales LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
IN RE ASACOL ANTITRUST LITIGATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv12730
Defendant: Allergan Inc., Allergan, PLC, Warner Chilcott (US), LLC and others
Plaintiff: Ahold USA, Inc., Meijer, Inc., Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court: Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?