Other Statutory Actions Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Sun v. New York State Attorney Genera
as 17-3697
Plaintiff - Appellant: Xiu Jian Sun, Servant of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints; The Spiritual Adam
Defendant - Appellee: New York State Attorney General, Charles F. Sanders, (Wang Xing Ren), Michael Siudzinski, (Wang Xing Ren) & Office of the Attorney General of NY and others
Sun et al v. State of New York Office of the Attorney General et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv05916
Defendant: 109 Precinct and 2 Female Enforcement Police Officers from 109 Precinct, Alfonse D'Amato Federal Courthouse, Attorney Generals Office of Eric T. Schneiderman and others
Pharisee: Akwei Oko Acquaye, Aprilanne Agostino, Thomas P. Aliotta and others
Wang Xing Ren: Aron M. Bloom, Daniele Dezago, Sean P. Greene and others
Wand Xing Ren: Robert L. Capers
Plaintiff: Xiu Jian Sun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Committee On Professional Stan v. Marin
as 17-1182
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee: Committee On Professional Standards
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant: Mel M. Marin
Hall v. Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No 15, LLC et al
as 6:2016cv06139
Plaintiff: Monica J. Hall
Defendant: Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No 15, LLC and Mel S Harris & Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Caro v. LVNV Funding, LLC et al
as 5:2015cv01438
Plaintiff: Stephen Caro
Defendant: LVNV Funding, LLC, Mel S. Harris and Associates, LLC, Stephen Einstein & Associates, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ken Saclo et al v. General Motors, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv04751
Plaintiff: Ken Saclo , Mel Cohen , Tiffany Malone and others
Defendant: General Motors, LLC and Continental Automotive Systems US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Goldenberg v. Mel S. Harris and Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv09004
Plaintiff: Leo Goldenberg
Defendant: Mel S. Harris and Associates, LLC , Mel S. Harris , Arthur Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sykes v. Mel S. Harris and Associate
as 13-2747
Petitioner: Michael Mosquera, John Andino, Philip M. Cannella and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: Monique Sykes, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Ruby Colon, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Rea Veerabadren, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: Mel Harris John Does 1-20, Mel Harris Jane Does 1-20, LR Credit John Does 1-20 and others
Defendant - Appellant: Mel S. Harris and Associates LLC, Mel S. Harris, Michael Young and others
Sykes v. Mel S. Harris and Associate
as 13-2748
Petitioner: Michael Mosquera, John Andino, Philip M. Cannella and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: Monique Sykes, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Ruby Colon, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Rea Veerabadren, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: Mel Harris John Does 1-20, Mel Harris Jane Does 1-20, LR Credit John Does 1-20 and others
Defendant - Appellant: Mel S. Harris and Associates LLC, Mel S. Harris, Michael Young and others
Sykes v. Mel S. Harris and Associate We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2742
Petitioner: Michael Mosquera, John Andino, Philip M. Cannella and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: Monique Sykes, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Ruby Colon, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Rea Veerabadren, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: Mel Harris John Does 1-20, Mel Harris Jane Does 1-20, LR Credit John Does 1-20 and others
Defendant - Appellant: Mel S. Harris and Associates LLC, Mel S. Harris, Michael Young and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?