Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Martin v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03094
Plaintiff:
Brittany Valencia Martin
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Jon Loftus, Melinda Eddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Blunt-Stevens et al
as 3:2024cv03038
Plaintiff:
Brittany Martin
Defendant:
Doug Blunt-Stevens, Cathy Greer, Jane Mokus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorris v. Logan Correctional Center et al
as 3:2023cv03353
Plaintiff:
Precious Dorris
Defendant:
Logan Correctional Center, Illinois Department of Corrections, . Morisetty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estrada v. People of the State of Illinois
as 3:2023cv03338
Petitioner:
Amber Rose Estrada
Respondent:
People of the State of Illinois and Melinda Eddy
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goff v. Stanbery et al
as 3:2023cv03280
Plaintiff:
Nathan Goff
Defendant:
M Stanbery, . Sleboda, . Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keb v. Eddy et al
as 1:2023cv05568
Petitioner:
Robert Keb
Respondent:
Melinda Eddy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jimmy Reiss v. Melinda Eddy
as 23-2584
Petitioner / Appellant:
JIMMY REISS
Respondent / Appellee:
MELINDA EDDY, Warden
Miller v. Eddy
as 3:2023cv50200
Petitioner:
Ronald A Miller
Respondent:
Melinda Eddy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Molina v. Eddy
as 3:2023cv50196
Petitioner:
Otoniel Molina
Respondent:
Melinda Eddy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Eddy
as 3:2023cv01641
Petitioner:
Christopher L Parker
Respondent:
Melinda Eddy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
