Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-15154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Abouelkhir v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2021cv00826
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Melissa Maxim, San Diego Field Office and others
Plaintiff:
Tamer Mohammed Abouelkhir
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447
Garcia et al v. Maxim et al
as 3:2020cv01922
Defendant:
Melissa Maxim, Chad Wolf, Does 1, 2, and 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Umut Kocer and Kimberly L. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Ramiro Cota Lieras v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-55391
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAMIRO COTA LIERAS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service, MELISSA MAXIM, Field Office Director U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, San Diego and others
Lieras v. Wolf et al
as 3:2020cv00381
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Cota Lieras
Defendant:
Kenneth Cuccinelli, Melissa Maxim, Does 1 and 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01330
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1421
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Cheema v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 3:2019cv00422
Plaintiff:
Ranjeeta Cheema
Defendant:
Melissa Maxim, L. Francis Cissna, Kirstjen Nielsen and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
