Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Hanna et al v. Mercedes Benz USA, LLC
as 4:2023cv12395
Plaintiff:
Ann Preston Hanna and John Jay Sherman Hanna, Jr.
Defendant:
Mercedes Benz USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Neo Wireless, LLC v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
as 2:2022cv11769
Plaintiff:
Neo Wireless, LLC
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
NEO Wireless, LLC Patent Litigation
as 2:2022md03034
In Re:
NEO Wireless, LLC Patent Litigation
Defendant:
Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, American Honda Motor Co Inc, Honda Development & Manufacturing of America, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Neo Wireless, LLC
Special Master:
Scott Woloson
Uzelac v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv10118
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, Daimler Trust and Daimler AG
Plaintiff:
Katina Uzelac
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Mercedes Benz USA LLC
as 2:2019cv10950
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Benz USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Mercedes Benz USA LLC v. Soto et al
as 2:2019cv10949
Defendant:
Jeff Soto and Maxx Gramajo
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Benz USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Mercedes Benz USA LLC v. Lewis
as 2:2019cv10948
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Benz USA LLC
Defendant:
James Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Mercedes Benz USA LLC v. Bombardier
as 2:2019cv10951
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Benz USA LLC
Defendant:
Daniel Bombardier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Kotha et al v. BMW AG et al
as 2:2017cv12836
Plaintiff:
Kashivishnatha Kotha , Irving Cohen , Dean Werner and others
Defendant:
BMW AG, BMW North America, LLC, Volkswagen AG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Orbital Australia Pty Ltd et al v. Daimler AG et al
as 2:2015cv12398
Plaintiff:
Orbital Australia Pty Ltd and Orbital Fluid Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Daimler AG , Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC , Mercedes-Benz U. S. International, Incorporated and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
