Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Gomez et al v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 2:2012cv00087
Plaintiff:
Enrique Gomez and Miriam DeGomez Velasco
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association , Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Inc, Bank of America, NA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King County Washington v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv01156
Plaintiff:
King County Washington
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Merrill Lynch Money Markets, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle v. Countrywide Securities Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv00148
Plaintiff:
Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle and Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle
Defendant:
Countrywide Securities Corporation, CWALT Inc, Countrywide Financial Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00150
Plaintiff:
Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle and Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith LLC, Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Inc and Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Deming v. First Franklin et al
as 3:2009cv05418
Plaintiff:
Roger J Deming
Defendant:
First Franklin, Merrill Lynch & CO Inc and Bank of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Jeld-Wen Inc et al v. Merrill Lynch International Incorporated et al
as 2:2008cv01338
Plaintiff:
Jeld-Wen Inc, Jeld-Wen Inc, JWI Inc and others
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch International Incorporated and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ellis v. Merrill Lynch Fenner Pierce
as 2:2008cv00254
Defendant:
Diana Zoe Ellis and Merrill Lynch Fenner Pierce
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
