Cases 61 - 70 of 15,574
LERMAN v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv05825
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LERMAN
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
WENDLING v. AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC LTD PLAN et al
as 5:2020cv05738
Plaintiff:
CAROL WENDLING
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC LTD PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
GRAHAM v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv05185
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
TRESSY GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
HILSTER et al v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv01537
Defendant:
CRANE INSTRUMENTATION & SAMPLING, INC., FLOWSERVE CORPORATION, SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SYSTEMS USA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W. HILSTER, JR. and SHIRLEY A. HILSTER
Counter Defendant:
GRINNELL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BRESLOW v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv04896
Plaintiff:
JORDAN BRESLOW
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LYNCH v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv04875
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
LETICIA LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
SULLIVAN v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv03854
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
KENNETH SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
KASS v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv01099
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
LISA KASS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Cikovic v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2020cv00892
Defendant:
Metlife Disability and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
James Cikovic
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
HENDERSON v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv00633
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE HENDERSON
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
