Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Davis v. CBD American Shaman, LLC
as 0:2020cv60897
Plaintiff:
Michael S Davis
Defendant:
CBD American Shaman, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv65937
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. KRUEGER et al
as 7:2020cv00056
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOSEPH DAVIS, SR
Defendant:
BETH C GREENE, LOWNDES COUNTY JAIL, WADE KRUEGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Steadfast Services Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01157
Defendant:
Robert Day, Steadfast Services Inc. and Michael Trey Davis
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Brooks
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv27296
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B DAVIS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv26125
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL NEWTON DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Davis v. Kenneth Fells, et al
as 19-11421
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL LEE DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT YARBROUGH, KENNETH FELLS, DAPHNE PARKER and others
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Davis
as 1:2018cv00617
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Michael J. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
DAVIS et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv00089
Plaintiff:
CAROL L DAVIS and MICHAEL D DAVIS
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
as 1:2018cv00102
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Davis
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Weissman, Nowack, Curry & Wilcox PC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
