Cases filed in Texas
Thiels v. Berger et al
as 4:2024cv01668
Plaintiff: Daniel Thiels
Defendant: William J. Berger, Robert L. Lane, Nora Mead Brownell and others
Morgan v. Swicegood et al
as 1:2019cv00463
Defendant: Richard Alford, Erica Swicegood and T Chudej
Plaintiff: Michael Eugene Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erwin et al v. Russ et al
as 6:2010cv00005
Plaintiff: Roy E. Erwin, Ruth Ilene Erwin Roberts, Ted Booher and others
Defendant: Bryan F. Russ, Jr., Bryan F. Russ, Jr., James H. McCullough and others
Counter Plaintiff: Jerry Baxter, Jerry Baxter, Deminimus Management LLC and others
Counter Defendant: Elizabeth Ann McKinney and Ruth Ilene Erwin Roberts
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Erwin et al v. Russ et al
as 6:2009cv00127
Plaintiff: Roy E. Erwin, Ruth Elene Erwin Roberts, Ted Booher and others
Defendant: Bryan F. Russ, Jr., James H. McCullough, Nestor Leamon and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Type: Other Statutes None
Woten et al v. Vesper et al
as 1:2008cv00599
Plaintiff: Michael Woten, Jr. and Michael Scott Morgan
Defendant: Rachel Vesper and Trinity Health Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv01163
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Type: Contract None
Morgan v. Salzman et al
as 4:2008cv00202
Plaintiff: Michael A Morgan
Defendant: Barry Salzman, Becker-Parkin Dental Supply Company Inc and Henry Schein Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
Anastacio Albarado Govea Jr. v. Charles James, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv00480
Plaintiff: Anastacio Albarado Govea, Jr
Defendant: Charles James, Michael W Morgan and Mark Brawn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?