Cases filed in Arizona
Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Garner v. United States Department of Defense et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00459
Plaintiff: Theresa Garner
Defendant: United States Department of Defense, United States Department of Commerce, Social Security Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Varela v. Astrue
as 2:2010cv01384
Defendant: Michael Astrue
Plaintiff: Manuel Varela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Provencio v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv01242
Defendant: Michael Astrue
Plaintiff: Alvin Provencio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Orndoff v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv01098
Defendant: Michael Astrue
Plaintiff: Deborah S Orndoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Prosser v Astrue
as 2:2010cv00013
Plaintiff: Deanna Prosser
Defendant: Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wright v. Astrue
as 2:2009cv02110
Plaintiff: Rebecca Wright
Defendant: Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mendoza We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00426
Plaintiff: Emilio E Mendoza
Defendant: Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Thrash v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01304
Plaintiff: Julie Thrash
Defendant: Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Masters v. Colvin
as 2:2009cv01208
Defendant: Michael Astrue
Plaintiff: Robert Masters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Quarles v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01015
Plaintiff: Ealene Quarles
Defendant: Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?