Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Gray v. Astrue
as 6:2013cv00014
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Carl D. Gray
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Harris v. Astrue
as 7:2013cv00024
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Kristina Kay Harris
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pettit v. Astrue
as 5:2013cv00006
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Amanda R. Pettit
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Saunders v. Astrue
as 6:2012cv00071
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Sharese S. Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lucas v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00582
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Robertson Lucas
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mabe v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00052
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Gregory M. Mabe
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Alston v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00553
Plaintiff:
Cynthia M. Alston
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Christian v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00822
Plaintiff:
Bernard Miles Christian, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Waller v. Astrue
as 6:2012cv00063
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Waller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Eggleston v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00043
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Carolyn R. Eggleston
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
