Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Liggins v. Capra
as 24-801
Petitioner:
JEFFREY LIGGINS
Respondent:
MICHAEL CAPRA, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility
Irick v. Capra, Superintendent of Sing Sing Correctional Facility
as 1:2023cv09123
Petitioner:
Wilbur Irick
Respondent:
Michael Capra, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility and Michael Capra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Underwood
as 23-595
Petitioner / Appellant:
Mark Richardson
Respondent / Appellee:
Michael Capra, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility
Caridad v. Capra, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility
as 1:2022cv08542
Petitioner:
Ramon Caridad
Respondent:
Michael Capra, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility and Michael Capra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crawford v. Capra
as 22-897
Petitioner / Appellant:
Bartholomew Crawford
Respondent / Appellee:
Michael Capra, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility
Acevedo et al v. Capra
as 21-1822
Petitioner / Appellant:
Tyrone Bowman, Corneal Cordon, Bruce Bryant and others
Petitioner:
Samuel Acevedo
Respondent / Appellee:
Michael Capra, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility
Herrera v. Capra
as 20-3770
Petitioner / Appellant:
Joel Herrera
Respondent / Appellee:
Michael Capra, Superintendent Sing Sing Correctional Facility
Acevedo et al v. Capra
as 1:2020cv07361
Petitioner:
Eugene Kindell, AA, Michael Sims and others
Respondent:
Michael Capra, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility and Michael Capra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Neree v. Capra
as 20-1996
Respondent / Appellee:
Michael Capra, Superintendent Sing SIng Correctional Facility
Petitioner / Appellant:
Hotson Neree
Harvey v. Capra
as 19-2397
Respondent:
Michael Capra, Superintendent,Sing Sing Correctional Facility
Petitioner:
Gregory Harvey
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
