Cases 1 - 10 of 19
LYNUM v. POLITICAL CANDIATES FEDERAL, STATE, COUNTRIES, CITIES, TOWNS, ANNEXES AND POLITICIANS IN HOLDING et al
as 1:2009cv00537
Plaintiff:
FELICIA LYNUM
Defendant:
POLITICAL CANDIATES FEDERAL, STATE, COUNTRIES, CITIES, TOWNS, ANNEXES AND POLITICIANS IN HOLDING, UNITED STATES JUSTICE DEPARMENT, ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MARTIN v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2009cv00169
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, THOMAS WIGHT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DOE v. RUMSFELD et al
as 1:2008cv01902
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
DONALD RUMSFELD, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, ROBERT S. MUELLER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
NEWBY v. BUSH et al
as 1:2008cv01624
Plaintiff:
BETTY ANN NEWBY
Defendant:
GEORGE H. BUSH, GEORGE H.W. BUSH, DICK CHENEY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01580
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PAUL et al v. BUSH et al
as 1:2008cv01317
Plaintiff:
K.A. PAUL and GLOBAL PEACE INITIATIVE, INC.
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH, CONDOLEEZZA RICE, JENDAYI FRAZIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEWBY v. BUSH et al
as 1:2008cv00983
Plaintiff:
BETTY ANN NEWBY
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH, GEORGE H. BUSH, JENNA BUSH HAGER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
