Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 169
Natty v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2011cv00093
Petitioner: Therese Veronica Natty
Respondent: Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Charles Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00040
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Narcisse v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2009cv00718
Petitioner: Yves Narcisse
Respondent: Michael Chertoff and David Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00716
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00555
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Gustave v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv00041
Petitioner: Patrick Gustave
Respondent: United States of America, Frank Sizer, Raymond Simonse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03835
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Gozo v. Chertoff et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00101
Petitioner: Makushamari Gozo
Respondent: Michael Chertoff and Raymond Simonse
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03285
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00206
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?