Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Snitzer v. The Board of Trustees of the A
as 20-3228
Defendant / Appellee:
Bill Thomas, Raymond M. Hair, Jr., Alan H. Raphael and others
Defendant:
Lovie Smith-Wright, Maureen B. Kilkelly, Elliot H. Greene and others
Appellant:
Martin Stoner
Plaintiff:
Andrew Snitzer, individually and as representatives of a class of similarly situated persons, on behalf of the American Federation o Musicians and Employers' Pension Plan and Paul Livant, individually and as representatives of a class of similarly situated persons, on behalf of the American Federation o Musicians and Employers' Pension Plan
American Transit Insurance Company v. Akpan et al
as 1:2018cv04420
Defendant:
First Care Chiropractic of N.J., P.C., Jeremy M Whitfield, D.C., Bruce C Bromberg, D.C. and others
Counter Claimant:
Northshore Chiropractic Diagnostics, P.C. and Mark Soffer, D.C.
Plaintiff:
American Transit Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Snitzer et al v. The Board of Trustees of the American Federation of Musicians and Employers' Pension Fund et al
as 1:2017cv05361
Plaintiff:
Andrew Snitzer and Paul Livant
Defendant:
The Board of Trustees of the American Federation of Musicians and Employers' Pension Fund , The Investment Committee of the Board of Trustees of the American Federation of Musicians and Employers' Pension Fund , Raymond M. Hair, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Johns & Allyn v. DeMartini et al
as 4:2014cv04660
Plaintiff:
Johns & Allyn
Defendant:
Michael DeMartini and Renate DeMartini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DeMartini v. Johns & Allyn, A.P.C.
as 3:2013cv03354
Plaintiff:
Michael DeMartini
Defendant:
Johns & Allyn, A.P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DeMartini et al v. Johns et al
as 3:2012cv03929
Plaintiff:
Michael DeMartini and Renate DeMartini
Defendant:
Thomas Christopher Johns and Johns & Allyn, A.P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
