Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Burnside v. Sheahan et al
as 1:2016cv07730
Plaintiff:
Elbonie Lashay Burnside
Defendant:
Michael F Sheahan and Cook County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Roscoe, et al v. Cook County, et al
as 12-1528
Plaintiff:
KIM YOUNG, RONALD JOHNSON, on behalf of themselves and a class of others similarly situated, WILLIAM JONES and others
Appellant:
ANTHONY ROSCOE
Defendant - Appellee:
COOK COUNTY, MICHAEL F. SHEAHAN, CALLIE BAIRD and others
Alvin McGee v. Michael Sheahan, et al
as 10-2920
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALVIN MCGEE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL F. SHEAHAN, COOK COUNTY, JOHN H. STROGER, JR. and others
McGee v. Sheahan et al
as 1:2010cv04417
Defendant:
Michael F Sheahan, Cook County, John Stroger, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Alvin McGee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Doe et al
as 1:2009cv06553
Plaintiff:
Vincent Reed
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mario D. Hawkins v. Cook County, Illinois, et al
as 09-2797
Appellant:
MARIO D. HAWKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, MICHAEL F. SHEAHAN, CALLIE BAIRD and others
James McRoy v. Michael Sheahan, et al
as 09-1377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES E. MCROY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL F. SHEAHAN, JOHN DOE, LENORD BERSKY, Chief Operating Officer of Cermak Health Services and others
Tolbert v. Fleming et al
as 1:2008cv05425
Plaintiff:
Vernon Tolbert
Defendant:
John J. Fleming, Michael F. Sheahan and Donald A. Hulick
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robert Clark v. Michael F. Sheahan, et al
as 08-4019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL F. SHEAHAN, THOMAS J. DART, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ and others
James McRoy v. Michael Sheahan, et al
as 08-2946
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES E. MCROY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL F. SHEAHAN, CALLIE BAIRD, CHESTER PLAXICO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
