Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Ford v. GlaxoSmithKline Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv11043
Plaintiff:
Michael Ford
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Walmart Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ford v. Federal Law Enforcement et al
as 1:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
Michael Ford and Michael Jamal Ford
Defendant:
Federal Law Enforcement, Jason Geist and Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv12657
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FORD v. BEASLEY et al
as 5:2020cv00424
Defendant:
BEASLEY, OFFICER LESLIE, SERGEANT WALLER and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Beasley et al
as 1:2020cv04384
Defendant:
Beasley, Officer Leslie, Officer Turner and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv70984
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv21788
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK MICHAEL FORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FORD JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv19832
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORD JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv17918
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ford v. Diversified Adjustment Service, Inc.
as 6:2019cv00922
Defendant:
Diversified Adjustment Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Ford
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
