Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Michael Ponder v. Hans-Peter Wild
as 23-5620
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL H. PONDER
Defendant / Appellee:
HANS-PETER WILD
Casun Invest, A.G. v. Michael Ponder, et al
as 23-15224
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CASUN INVEST, A.G., a Swiss corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL H. PONDER, an individual, LEZLIE GUNN, an individual and NVWS PROPERTIES, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company
Casun Invest A.G. v. NVWS Properties LLC
as 5:2023mc80032
Plaintiff:
Casun Invest A.G.
Defendant:
NVWS Properties LLC, Michael H. Ponder and Lezlie Gunn
Petitioner:
Ronald Simpson
Interested Party:
Christine Drage, Joseph Ira Burkemper and Weil & Drage, APC
Casun Invest, A.G. v. Michael Ponder, et al
as 22-16273
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CASUN INVEST, A.G., a Swiss corporation
Defendant:
MICHAEL H. PONDER, an individual and LEZLIE GUNN, an individual
Defendant / Appellant:
NVWS PROPERTIES, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company
Casun Invest, A.G. v. Michael Ponder, et al
as 22-16275
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CASUN INVEST, A.G., a Swiss corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL H. PONDER, an individual, LEZLIE GUNN, an individual and NVWS PROPERTIES, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00754
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Contract Dispute
Ponder v. Wild
as 2:2019cv00166
Defendant:
Hans-Peter Wild
Plaintiff:
Michael H. Ponder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ponder v. Wild
as 2:2018cv01604
Defendant:
Hans-Peter Wild
Plaintiff:
Michael H Ponder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
NOT USED
as 2:2016cv02304
Defendant:
Michael H Ponder and Hans-Peter Wild
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
