Cases 1 - 10 of 313
TAYLOR v. ASTRUE
as 1:2013cv00162
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
BETTY A. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
REIGER v. ASTRUE
as 1:2013cv00022
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
SABRINA L. REIGER
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
HAWKINS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2013cv00019
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
DORIEN A. HAWKINS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
TINSON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01818
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE TINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
O. v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01815
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
S. D. O.
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BAKER v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01814
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. BAKER
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
CAPPS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01776
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
HERMAN A. CAPPS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
JOHNSON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01767
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
HARVEY L. JOHNSON, JR.
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
COLLINS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01761
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
TONIA J. COLLINS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DUPONT v. ASTRUE
as 4:2012cv00147
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS DUPONT, JR.
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
