Cases 91 - 100 of 807
KENDRICK v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01109
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
MONIQUE D. KENDRICK
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DAVIS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01101
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. DAVIS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
LITTLE v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01080
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY P. LITTLE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
WARE v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01081
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY L. WARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
HASH v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01077
Defendant:
MICHAEL J ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L HASH
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MILLER v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01075
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MILLER
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HILL v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01060
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
GENESIS M. HILL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
PLACKE v. ASTRUE
as 4:2012cv00087
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
TINA PLACKE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
GARDNER v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv00217
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER L GARDNER
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
GRANT v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01036
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
STACIE L. GRANT
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
