Cases 41 - 50 of 682
Shifflett v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00122
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Ashlie B. Shifflett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Katenkamp v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00543
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Victoria Katenkamp
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hannah v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00119
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Carlus F. Hannah
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Snider v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00539
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Rebecca A. Snider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Riegel v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00526
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Davida S. Riegel
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
White v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00117
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Larry W. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Schultz v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00511
Defendant:
Commissioner Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Betty Ann Schultz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
McGlothin v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00506
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Louella McGlothin
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bottoms v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00048
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Dereck Bottoms
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hoopes v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv00068
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Edward Charles Hoopes
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.