Cases 51 - 60 of 682
Bolling v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00035
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
David Allen Bolling
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Brooks v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00112
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Rhonda P. Brooks
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Long v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00490
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Walter Joe Long, Jr.
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Peterson v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00489
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Curtis W. Peterson
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stonestreet v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00111
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Philip Stonestreet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Keith v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv00062
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Lou Gary Keith
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Via v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00109
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Todd L. Via
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Furrow v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00478
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
James D. Furrow, Jr.
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
West v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv00059
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Robert F West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
White v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00458
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Francis B. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
