Cases 71 - 80 of 117
CLARK v. ASTRUE et al
as 1:2009cv01568
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE M. CLARK
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 rsi Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
TAYLOR v. ASTRUE et al
as 1:2009cv01577
Plaintiff:
SHARON TAYLOR
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
NICOD v. ASTRUE
as 1:2009cv01578
Plaintiff:
NELLY NICOD
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
FORD v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2009cv01386
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. FORD, JR.
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, LINDA S. MCMAHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARTINEZ-HERNANDEZ v. ASTRUE
as 1:2009cv01279
Plaintiff:
ALBERTO MARTINEZ-HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
FORD v. ASTRUE et al
as 1:2009cv01243
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. FORD, jR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, LINDA S. MCMAHON and CAROLYN L. SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
DAVIS v. ASTRUE et al
as 1:2009cv01168
Plaintiff:
TENNELLE DAVIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Chris Walters v. Michael Astrue, et al
as 09-5206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Chris Walters
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael J. Astrue and Social Security Administration
SAVOY v. ASTRUE et al
as 1:2009cv01012
Plaintiff:
DORIS SAVOY
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Kevin Jones v. William Taylor
as 09-5192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kevin M. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
William C. Taylor, Commissioner of Social Security and Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
