Cases 71 - 80 of 806
SCROGHAM v. COLVIN
as 4:2012cv00111
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
KENNETH OWEN SCROGHAM
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HAGGARD v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01263
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
BECKY G. HAGGARD
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
REID v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01230
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. REID, II
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MOBLEY v. ASTRUE
as 4:2012cv00105
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE D. MOBLEY
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
THOMPSON v. ASTRUE et al
as 4:2012cv00106
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER LEANNE THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BURGESS v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv00252
Defendant:
MICHAEL J ASTRUE and SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
CHARLES H BURGESS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MILKS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01200
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B. MILKS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
JOHNSON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01185
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
JANICE JOHNSON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
JANSEN v. ASTRUE
as 4:2012cv00097
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
ANNA M. JANSEN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BIRGE v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01159
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
DARCIE BIRGE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
