Cases 81 - 90 of 2,508
Teyer v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv00001
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Plaintiff:
Michael Teyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Jordan v. Astrue
as 4:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Larry Jordan
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Southard v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00216
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Southard
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. Astrue DO NOT DOCKET IN (miscellaneous case number). ENTRIES SHOULD BE MADE IN THE RELATED CIVIL CASE 4:13-cv-00034.
as 4:2012mc00795
Plaintiff:
Rachelle Jones
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Gonzales v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv01222
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Rosa Gonzales
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Acero v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00502
Plaintiff:
Salvador Acero
Defendant:
Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Ramirez Jr. v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00498
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Alvino Ramirez Jr.
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Noack v. Astrue
as 6:2012cv00342
Defendant:
Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Noack
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mendoza v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv03661
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Michelle Mendoza
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
