Cases 81 - 90 of 2,163
Garcia v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv00204
Plaintiff:
Carlos R Garcia, Jr
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Garcia v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00469
Defendant:
Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Carmen Garcia
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Jones v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00835
Plaintiff:
Billy Anthony Jones
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Tulowiecki v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00731
Plaintiff:
Mark Tulowiecki
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gamboa v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00465
Defendant:
Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Rosendo Gamboa
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Serrano v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00466
Defendant:
Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Teresa Serrano
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Burns v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv03435
Plaintiff:
Bonnie M. Burns
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Prather v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv01075
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Prather
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Biles v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv04738
Plaintiff:
Robin Kemp Biles
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rodriguez v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00825
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Gail Rodriguez
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
