Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Cases 11 - 20 of 334
Jones v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00909
Plaintiff: Gail S. Jones
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Grant v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv00191
Plaintiff: Laura Grant
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moore v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00664
Plaintiff: Heather Moore
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Persaud v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00661
Plaintiff: Shanta Persaud
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thomas v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv00179
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Thomas
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Futrell v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00025
Plaintiff: Jacquline M. Futrell
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Futrell v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00634
Plaintiff: Jacquline M. Futrell
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bell v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00178
Plaintiff: Christopher Bell
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Davenport v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01315
Plaintiff: Sherry L. Davenport
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hoover v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv01298
Plaintiff: Colleen Renee Hoover
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?