Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Fatir v. Coupe et al
as 1:2016cv00932
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, Perry Phelps, Chris Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fatir v. Coupe et al
as 1:2016cv00315
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, Perry Phelps, Chris Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ali v. Markell et al
as 1:2015cv01184
Plaintiff:
Shamsidin Ali
Defendant:
Jack Markell, Robert Coupe, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young et al v. Phelps
as 1:2015cv00325
Plaintiff:
Idris Young, Ernest Parson, Michael Manley and others
Defendant:
Perry Phelps , David Pierce , James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardwick v. Phelps
as 1:2015cv00326
Plaintiff:
James Hardwick
Defendant:
Perry Phelps , David Pierce , James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Desmond et al v. Phelps et al
as 1:2012cv01120
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Mafidh as Salafi, Christopher Desmond, Idris Young and others
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, David Pierce, James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Biggins v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00732
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Carl C. Danberg, Thomas L. Carroll, Mike Deloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Biggins v. Markell et al
as 1:2010cv00250
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Jack A. Markell, Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paynter et al v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00088
Plaintiff:
Bryan Paynter, Donald Cole, Kendal Robertson and others
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Michael Knight, Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Biggins v. Markell et al
as 1:2009cv00245
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Jack Markell, Carl C. Danberg, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
